Showing items 1 to 100 from total of 390 items. Ordered by photo # descending.
Photo # ![]() |
Photo | Caption | Categorisation |
---|---|---|---|
164262 | ![]() | Slow down traffic past school – 20 mph – www.20splentyorg | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
162429 | ![]() | I agree there's a problem as the cycleway is far too narrow and close to to motor traffic. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162211 | ![]() | The Eastern Road cycleway is a fantastic facility but it is too narrow at this point and visibility at the traffic signals is very limited. This causes conflict and danger for both cyclists and pedestrians. If it can be widened it would be of great benefit to all users and improve the perception of danger as a result of both pedestrians and cyclists moving close to the carriageway.. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162207 | ![]() | I would suggest look at how cycling ways in Amsterdam have been developed and adopt their tried and tested cycle and road integration schemes. Fully in support of improvements to encourage more people to walk and cycle along the Eastern Rd [Portsmouth area?] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162206 | ![]() | Widen pavement to allow cyclist pedestrians to move more safely at the harvester section of the road | Track: Problem track |
162197 | ![]() | Traffic fumes make it hard to breathe when cycling or walking. In some places along the Eastern Road, the cycle/walking lane is too narrow. [Portsmouth area?] | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
162196 | ![]() | The current path is too narrow for cyclists and pedestrians! I was nearly taken out by a cyclist heading south opposite Snows as he came up behind me as I was walking . [Portsmouth area?] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162195 | ![]() | As previously mentioned both cyclists and pedestrians are too close to faster than speed limit traffic. The ONLY solution is to take them both away from near the road and not just widen what’s already there. I think this would only be possible using an easterly route and not on the west side of Eastern Road. Make a combined cycle and pedestrian route that attempts to follow the shoreline, possibly using a similar method as was used on Hilsea Ramparts/Alexandra Park combining a concrete sea wall and pathway wide enough for cyclists and pedestrians. Central government appear to be handing out money for anything so ask them as part of protecting Portsmouth from rising sea levels. In time this could be undertaken near Milton Common shoreline to give a route right down the east of Portsea Iland to the seafront at Eastney. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162194 | ![]() | Throughout most of the Eastern Road, the route used by cyclists is dangerously close to fast moving vehicles. Also pedestrians also are too close to the traffic. | Track: Problem track |
162154 | ![]() | The basic problem is that there are two types of cyclists, the get from A to B speed merchants and the old plodders. The speed merchant cyclists are a danger to themselves and should not mix with pedestrians or vehicular traffic. All cyclists and pedestrians should be kept separate from vehicular traffic. [Portsmouth area?] | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
162150 | ![]() | Much too narrow for walkers and cyclists to share and no kind of barrier between them and busy traffic [Portsmouth area?] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162143 | ![]() | Too narrow & dangerous [Portsmouth area?] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
162092 | ![]() | Bridge footpath is to narrow and existing safety barriers are to low to prevent cyclist ,pedestrians falling into the road,safety barriers should be heightend | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
161782 | ![]() | Canal towpath busy here - cyclists need more space with walkers | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
161781 | ![]() | Canal towpath busy here - cyclists need more space with walkers | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
161780 | ![]() | Canal towpath ends here - cyclists need to use busy Barton ROAD & bridge to connect | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
157631 | ![]() | Need a pavement for safe walking. | Track: Problem track |
157515 | ![]() | £££ spend on bridge maintenance New paint ✅ Fresh tarmac ✅ Removal of discriminatory barriers 🛑 We can do better than this @SalfordCCHelp. t.co/0zSCwmdJKg | Obstruction: Problem obstructions |
157164 | ![]() | The cycleway is narrow and has not been maintauned in years. It has cracked surfaces, potholes and floods. 2 pedestrians cannot pass let alone 2 cyclists. It runs along a busy, fast main road and is dangerous. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
156085 | ![]() | Increased traffic | Track: Problem track |
156080 | ![]() | Increase in traffic makes walking hazardous | Track: Problem track |
156078 | ![]() | We need to walk in the road to get to the school which is ridiculous even when not considering the speed people travel on this road. The road has no curb either which is illogical. Who would plan a road like this!? | Track: Problem track |
156074 | ![]() | Increased traffic | Track: Problem track |
155314 | ![]() | Short stretch of cycleway - just long enough to bump over a dropped kerb at a tangent, a cycle symbol, an arrow, some incorrect tactile paving, a give way marking and another angled dropped kerb.. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155311 | ![]() | Dangerously narrow half width cycle lane - scary when the trams come past. A stretch of the national cycle network that Sustrans decided to retain! | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155310 | ![]() | Dangerously narrow half width cycle lane | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155309 | ![]() | Short stretch of cycleway soon ends at a cyclist dismount sign | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155308 | ![]() | Short cycleway heads over some ladder paving to a cyclist dismount sign. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155306 | ![]() | cycleway gives way to minor side road | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155305 | ![]() | Cyclists Dismount sign at end of cycleway - but no ramp to rejoin carriageway. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
155304 | ![]() | Pedestrian/Cycle swing bridge. | Cycleway: Infrastructure cycleways |
155049 | ![]() | Needs a cycleway/path to improve access from Brant Road into North Hykeham as mainly [un?]useable between Autumn and Spring. It would save on a lot of traffic going from Brant Road to North Hykeham schools and make it safer and more enjoyable for children as well as adults to walk/cycle between the two areas. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
153707 | ![]() | Please create more cycleway separated from road traffic | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
153646 | ![]() | One way system | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
153400 | ![]() | Fast cars on the B4114 particularly from Croft to Narborough mean people are afraid to cycle | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
153399 | ![]() | Fast cars on the B4114 particularly from Croft to Narborough mean people are afraid to cycle | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
152681 | ![]() | A cycle path from Bruton up to the school would be amazing. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
152486 | ![]() | B4060 too busy and dangerous to cycle | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
152120 | ![]() | Temporary no-entry for motor vehicles and extra wide cycle lane for cycling, due to COVID-19 This filter makes a big difference, especially as at the top (and west) Deansgate has been temporarily pedestrianised. | Temporary closure: Good practice closure |
151900 | ![]() | With the current Covid situation; children, parents and teachers need more space to be able to drop children and keep a safe level of social distancing | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
151857 | ![]() | Additional problem added in to the dangerous cycle lanes leading to the station | Track: Problem track |
151668 | ![]() | Covid pedestrian area up Belgrave road could be shared with cycles on the outside . just open the traffic bollards a little. otherwise cyclists are trapped in the single lane traffic with cars. hold up the traffic speed and cannot ride safely either. I know this may not be possible but it would be a real help to allow shared pop up walking and cycle lane in rush hours school run times where the pedestrian widenned area goes 100% unsused. I have been cycling up there for 3 weeks and at school run times eg between 7.30 and 9am I have seen ZERO pedestrians using it. also rush hour in the afternoon eg 3pm -5pm shared pop up would be brilliant. Thankyou again P. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
151649 | ![]() | The traffic is terrible. Speeding is rife. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
150204 | ![]() | At the moment you have to walk on the road to reach the rugby club, Dr Surgery or the main Wragby Road. It’s extremely dangerous and many would benefit from a pavement for walking and cycling | Track: Problem track |
150160 | ![]() | Very dangerous. The safest route on foot involves crossing the road twice on bad bends. 40 mph limit | Track: Problem track |
150151 | ![]() | Pavement | Track: Problem track |
150043 | ![]() | This area between Kempsey and Worcester can easily be extended to a cycleway/pedestrian shared space. It is tight in some places but will be able to become a wide route and much safer as there is more traffic at present. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
149979 | ![]() | ⁶The wooden 'chicane' means most cyclists have to dismount and lose momentum at the start of a long, fairly steep slope, even on an e-bike. There must be a better design, such as at Huxhams Cross, where the components of the barrier are further apart. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
149953 | ![]() | Rat run. Close junction to Theo traffic on Barnes rd | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
149849 | ![]() | Rat run. Close junction to Theo traffic on Barnes rd | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
149637 | ![]() | Needs urgent attention if to be beneficial and safe for all. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
149505 | ![]() | Stiles and weeds in the way. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
149350 | ![]() | Pedestrians cannot walk safely along the road and for families with children who live along this road this is totally unacceptable | Track: Problem track |
149206 | ![]() | Pedestrianise Church Street in the summer months or permanently. People would love to sit out here and walk to the priory or quay without car disruption | Track: Problem track |
148903 | ![]() | Dedicated cycle path needed into town. Wide enough for families, possibly using the side roads. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
148769 | ![]() | No cycle lane | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
148583 | ![]() | A607 junction with Gaddesby very bad for cyclists to cross & get back on the road to the village | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
148467 | ![]() | Footpath overgrown | Track: Problem track |
148005 | ![]() | Not one of the above categories, but safer and more secure parking needed for cycles. As an example, I know of two people who had locked cycles stolen from Springfields on the same weekend. Both reported to police and Springfields, the latter saying their CCTV didn’t cover that area. People will not cycle if they half expect to have to walk home. Also, too many cars parked illegally around the bridge on Roman Bank so as to avoid paying parking at Springfields. This makes it dangerous for cyclists at that point. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
148004 | ![]() | Overall in the area roads are poor with potholes causing damage to cycles and cyclists. Why are they so badly maintained? | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
148003 | ![]() | There is an abundance of quiet, rural cycle routes on the Weston Hills side of Spalding. However, the roundabout over the A16 is difficult at times to get over, especially if you are taking your children. Could anything be done here? | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
147621 | ![]() | Harrowby Lane from approx this point to Belton Lane is a narrow road with a poorly maintained pavement on one side. The pavement slopes and there are street lights and a telecom box plus very often parked vehicles avoiding being being hit by large lorries that regularly speed up and down. Harrowby Lane is used as a "rat run" by huge lorries to access Alma Park Industrial Estate and the High Dyke. These lorries and the speed make not only walking hazardous but certainly cycling. A flashing speed limit sign and a limit on vehicles weight eg:7.5 tonnes is needed to make this road safe. . | Track: Problem track |
147591 | ![]() | No footpath or cycleway. Very dangerous. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147526 | ![]() | Keep the seafront road closed to cars, buses and cyclists only. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147525 | ![]() | Not big enough | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147510 | ![]() | We need a cycle route between Langtoft and Baston and Baston to Thurlby It was never completed | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147495 | ![]() | Why not make a cycle route from train station to Springfield road which runs along side the train track to avoid cars if possible. The main reason for cycle routes is not to always be next to moving or dumb parked cars. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147453 | ![]() | More connected cycle routes and an online map that is easier to use/navigate. More bike storage. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147402 | ![]() | Keep the seafront road closed to cars, buses and cyclists only. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147392 | ![]() | Awful for cycling. Cars constantly pulling out in front of people, double parking, parking on double yellows. Needs cycle lanes on both sides | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147172 | ![]() | The cycle track from Odder to the Pyewipe needs tarmacing the same as Pyewipe to Lincoln and Pyewipe to Harby. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
147145 | ![]() | It would be great to have a full cycle path link to Newark as it stops at the swinderby roundabout. This would enable easier commutes to Newark and Lincoln | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
146945 | ![]() | Excellent connection from Saxilby to Lincoln and cycle routes but needs widening and tarmacing to be safe to get cyclists off a57 | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
146902 | ![]() | Pedestrianised top half of High Street, Mablethorpe. More people gravitate up there and you can’t social distance because of the road and the pavement, although rude, isn’t rude enough | Track: Problem track |
146248 | ![]() | Very busy road used by school children and others on route to Cuckfield | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
146160 | ![]() | If QR pedestrianised create spaces for disabled parking between VPR and Howard Road | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
146102 | ![]() | Cycling on BCP promenade | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
145346 | ![]() | Cycle priority is needed along whole of perimeter road. Cyclists are required to give way not only at side roads but also factory entrances! On balance I feel safer on the road where I at least have priority. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
145208 | ![]() | The path is too narrow to walk with a child, the vehicles are parked against the kerb so stepping into the road is impossible. The vehicles use it as a cut through to miss the ring road traffic lights in both directions and do not adhere to the 20 mph restriction | Track: Problem track |
144904 | ![]() | Cars are usually parked in the cycle lane and the route is incomplete. Where the road narrows the cycle path disappears. It is a section of a cycle lane which doesn't connect anywhere. There is no segregation between cars and cyclists. A complete route from Cooden Beach station and the A259 and Bexhill Prom is required. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
144703 | ![]() | The promenade of Bournemouth beach has become very dangerous for pedestrians. Cyclists need to be banned. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
144655 | ![]() | Improved access between Finstock & Charlbury via Cornbury park. Too many gates, poor surface (impossible in wet weather) and road route is much too dangerous. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
144566 | ![]() | Traffic free path required alongside B3213 between Ivybridge as there are too many cars close passing | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
144477 | ![]() | Holderhurst road to town centre Dedicated cycle road connecting Bournemouth to Poole | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
144433 | ![]() | Terrible junction. Outdated rails to pen peds in. Need clearer better crossings for people. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
144211 | ![]() | Have you thought about roofing over some of the main traffic routes in the centre, whenever you come to a significant re-development? Keep the motorised traffic below and open up fresh pedestrian and cycle ways above? Shops and offices would have to move their front doors up a level but that would not be difficult. It works well in other traffic-dense cities. | Track: Problem track |
143937 | ![]() | Dedicated cycle lane, which is segregated from vehicles | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143852 | ![]() | Pavement & cycling provision required ALL along the Ashford Road on one side continuously. At the moment it is too dangerous to walk or cycle from the nearby villages so we have to take a car. Pavements are very narrow, if they exist at all. They stop at the most dangerous places forcing pedestrians into the road. When they do appear again they are on the other side of the road - forcing people to walk on the very dangerous road and constant crossing in very dangerous areas. Cyclists are often knocked off their bikes, most people don't want to put their life at risk. So the healthy, environmentally friendly option is the most dangerous. This is simply unacceptable in this day and age. Pedestrian and cycle path all along this road (on the same side) is the answer. Instead of building more houses, buy a strip of land next to the road to make this happen. At this point there should be a pedestrian crossing for the Primary School and Sheldwich village; it would be a huge help at this accident hot-spot as there are many accidents here due to cars trying to get across this 4 way junction - putting cyclists, pedestrians and drivers at risk - with many young children around. Many thanks. | Track: Problem track |
143823 | ![]() | Wider, brighter pavements. Compulsory cycle and escooter training. Maybe education will help prevent accidents and near misses. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143807 | ![]() | It doesn't feel safe to leave a bicycle here. Secure covered cycle racks need to be installed in White River Place, particularly outside the cinema, preferably with some kind of surveillance. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143802 | ![]() | Stop building shared pavements, these are dangerousness. Cyclist belong on the road. Town and Country Act 1888 Section 2 | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
143730 | ![]() | Broken pavements, cars parked on them hedges overgrowing and cyclists riding fast and making you jump out of the way. Stopping cars on the pavements also cyclists and making home owners cut back hedges. Also the government could allocate some money to fix the pavements. | Track: Problem track |
143681 | ![]() | Remind cyclists that it is illegal to cycle on the pavement and to ask parents to stop teaching their children to ride on pavements which are for pedestrians only unless otherwise specified by markings. This is borough-wide. | Track: Problem track |
143659 | ![]() | On all roads other than commercial zones pavements should be marked for pedestrians and runners one way only i.e. the same as for cards : "walk/run on the left". This would avoid the constant crossing of roads or walking in the road itself to avoid oncoming pedestrians | Track: Problem track |
143657 | ![]() | Lymington Road needs clear indication where cycleway ends. [coast of Hampshire, presumably] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143653 | ![]() | I agree either close this road or make it one way | Temporary closure: Problem closure |
143619 | ![]() | The cycle path comes and goes along here, up on to the pavement and off again is not a safe option with children on the school run | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143228 | ![]() | Don’t close the parking! [probably Evening Hill, Sandbanks, yet again] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143190 | ![]() | Leave as is for watersports access [probably Sandbanks area] | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |
143164 | ![]() | It is fine as it is, serves the purpose as a main road in and out of Bath. The canal tow path gives an excellent cycle and walking alternative. | Cycleway: Problem cycleways |